Supreme Court News: The Supreme Court on Thursday reprimanded the Uttar Pradesh government for not taking appropriate action against the petitioners under the Anti Gangster Act. The Supreme Court even asked the UP government that you are not a complainant but oppressive. A bench of Justice BR Gawai and K Vinod Chandra had questioned the affidavit filed by the state against an accused.
In response to this affidavit, he questioned why the cases should not be dismissed against him or why they should not be acquitted. You have also included cases here which have been rejected or acquitted. Is this your functioning? If this is the case, you can be called oppressive, not a criminal.
The court then granted bail to four people facing allegations under the Uttar Pradesh gangsters and anti -social activities (prevention) Act, 1986. The bench asked the UP government whether the petitioner was released on bail in some cases and if some proceedings have been canceled, he should be released. You do not find it necessary that you present real facts before the court.
The accused challenged their bail plea in the Supreme Court after the Allahabad High Court rejected his bail plea in November 2024. The counsel for the accused said that he was a real brother and a case was registered against him after 2017, when his father was a political party member of a political party.
He said that the state has adopted such a functioning in this case that if the applicant gets bail in one case, an FIR is registered against him in another case. Thus, no way of relief for the applicant is open. Its affidavit of the state states that 28 FIRs have been lodged against one applicant and 15 FIRs against the other.
