Host: Afrida Rahman Ali
Guest 1: Prashant Desai, President of Sri Ganesh Murti Makers’ Association, Maharashtra
Guest 2: Stalin Dayanand, Environmentalist
Afrida Rahman Ali: Welcome to our live discussion. Today, we’re diving into the heated debate surrounding the Bombay High Court’s order banning Plaster of Paris (POP) idols for Ganesh Chaturthi. Thousands of artisans have protested this decision, claiming that the court’s decision will harm their businesses and the quality of idols. Joining us today are Prashant Desai, the president of the Sri Ganesh Murti Makers’ Association, and Stalin Dayanand, an environmentalist. Let’s get started.
Afrida Rahman Ali: Mr. Prashant Desai, can you explain why the artisans are protesting against the ban on POP idols?
Prashant Desai: Absolutely, Afrida. The primary reason we’re protesting is that the court’s ban on POP idols impacts our livelihoods. The tall Ganpati idols, which are a hallmark of the festival, are structurally more reliable when made from POP. Clay idols just cannot bear the weight and size required for these large installations. Artisans across Maharashtra, especially in Mumbai and Pune, rely on POP to craft these idols. Clay simply doesn’t work in the same way for bigger idols.
Afrida Rahman Ali: So, the artisans claim that clay idols lack the strength needed, especially for the bigger statues. Stalin Dayanand, what’s your take on this issue?
Stalin Dayanand: I understand the concerns, but the issue is much larger. We cannot ignore the environmental impact of using POP. POP is a non-biodegradable material that leads to serious pollution, particularly when idols are immersed in water. The chemicals used in POP and the paints used for decoration harm the aquatic life and water sources. While I understand the artisans’ need for durable idols, the long-term environmental consequences are far worse. The transition to clay idols is necessary, and we must prioritize the environment.
Afrida Rahman Ali: Mr. Desai, what do you think about the environmental concerns raised by Mr. Dayanand?
Prashant Desai: I agree that environmental sustainability is crucial, but we also need to strike a balance. The artisans have been making idols for generations, and we have the expertise to create sturdy idols using POP. The size and the structure needed for these idols simply can’t be achieved with clay. However, we are open to exploring other alternatives if they can match the quality and durability of POP while being environmentally friendly.
Afrida Rahman Ali: Mr. Dayanand, do you think there are alternatives to POP that could satisfy both the artisans and environmental concerns?
Stalin Dayanand: Yes, there are alternatives that could be explored. Materials like recycled paper pulp, which are both durable and eco-friendly, have been used in other parts of the world. There are also developments in biodegradable materials that could work well for idols. But the key issue is the mindset – we need to accept that change is difficult, but necessary. We cannot continue to use harmful materials indefinitely just because it’s easier.
Afrida Rahman Ali: Mr. Desai, you mentioned the tall idols like Lalbaugcha Raja. Do you believe it’s impossible to replicate these in eco-friendly materials?
Prashant Desai: It’s not impossible, but it’s definitely a challenge. The sheer volume of idols, especially during Ganesh Chaturthi, is massive. We’re talking about over 13,000 idols to be made in a short period of time. If the government supports us in finding sustainable alternatives, we’ll be more than happy to adopt them. But without proper support and research into viable options, the transition will be extremely difficult.
Afrida Rahman Ali: Mr. Dayanand, what do you say to this challenge? How can we overcome it?
Stalin Dayanand: The challenge is significant, but not insurmountable. It requires cooperation between the government, artisans, and environmentalists. Research into eco-friendly materials and funding for the development of those materials will be key. The government needs to incentivize the use of these alternatives. And more importantly, there needs to be a cultural shift. We need to recognize that preserving our environment is just as important as preserving our traditions.
Afrida Rahman Ali: This debate is heating up, but what’s clear is that there needs to be a balance between cultural preservation and environmental responsibility. Mr. Desai, do you think the court’s decision is final, or do you expect further action on this?
Prashant Desai: We will continue to voice our concerns, and I hope that the court, after reviewing all the facts, will reconsider. There needs to be a comprehensive solution that includes both sustainable practices and the protection of livelihoods. We’re not against change, but we need a solution that works for everyone.
Afrida Rahman Ali: Mr. Dayanand, would you like to comment on this?
Stalin Dayanand: I agree with Mr. Desai that we need a solution, but the solution must be in line with environmental responsibility. The court has taken a stand, and now it’s up to the artisans, government, and environmentalists to collaborate on creating a more sustainable future. It’s about the long-term well-being of the planet.
Afrida Rahman Ali: Well, thank you both for sharing your insights. This is certainly an ongoing conversation, and we will continue to track it closely. We hope to see meaningful solutions emerge that respect both tradition and the environment. Thank you, Mr. Desai, and thank you, Mr. Dayanand, for joining us today.
Prashant Desai: Thank you, Afrida. It’s been a pleasure.
Stalin Dayanand: Thank you, Afrida. I hope the discussion brings about some positive changes.
Afrida Rahman Ali: And thank you, everyone, for tuning in. Stay with us as we continue to follow this important issue.
