Trump administration rebuked on the exile of illegal migrants
In the US, the conflict between President Donald Trump’s government and the judiciary is constantly increasing. After coming to power for the second time, the Trump administration took several controversial decisions, which the US courts have repeatedly stayed. In the same sequence, on Monday, an American court made strong comments on the behavior of the Trump administration with illegal migrants.
During the hearing, American Circuit Justice Petricia Melte said that the attitude of the Trump administration is so harsh that the Nazis also got more rights during the Second World War. He questioned government lawyer Drew Ensine whether the citizens of Venezuela were given an opportunity to present their case before deporting?
Court stays the decision of Trump administration
The Trump government had decided to deport the citizens of Venezuela by linking it to the banned group D Aragua gang, which was temporarily stopped by the US district court in Washington. In response, the Trump administration filed a petition in the appellate court and Trump even demanded the judge’s impeachment.
What is the Alien Anemi Act?
The Trump administration has recently implemented the “Alien Anemy Act”.
-
This law was enacted during tension with France in 1798.
-
Under this, the President gets the right to detain and deport any foreign national during the war of national security.
-
Last time this law was used in World War II on Japanese, German and Italian migrants.
More than 200 migrants exiled, El Salvador sent
On 15 March, the Trump administration deported more than 200 Venezuelai citizens, who were placed in a high-security prison in Al Salvador. According to reports, the US paid $ 6 million to the government of Al Salvador under the deal.
Carry over judiciary increased
The conflict between the White House and the courts has intensified due to the continuous blocking of the Trump administration’s decisions by the US judiciary. Trump has openly started rhetoric against the judges and termed the decisions of several courts as “anti-national”.
This conflict can later have a major impact on American democracy and constitutional balance.
