Supreme Court on Rape Case: The Supreme Court has made important remarks while giving the verdict in the 40 -year -old rape case. The Supreme Court said, “It is not necessary to have bruises on private parts to prove rape.” Other evidence can also be made the basis for this. A tuition teacher was accused of raping his own student. The teacher said, “There are no marks of injury to the victim’s private organs and hence rape cannot be proved.” The victim’s mother has falsely accused me.
Injury to private organs is not necessary to prove rape
While rejecting both the arguments, a bench of Justices Sandeep Mehta and Prasanna B said, “No marks of injury were found in the medical report.” However, this does not mean that other evidences cannot be ignored. Justice Varale said, ‘It is not necessary that injury marks should be found on the victim’s body in all cases of rape. In any case it depends on the situation. Therefore, the victim’s body cannot be considered necessary to prove the charge of rape.
The matter took 40 years to pass through a three -tier judicial system.
At the same time, on the allegations made by the accused on the victim’s mother, the bench said that in such a case, there is no point in the root of the case. We have not received any reason why the mother will harass her daughter and file a false case to trap the teacher. It has nothing to do with his mother’s character. Let us tell you that the matter took 40 years to go through a three -tier judicial system.
The incident took place in 1984.
The incident took place in 1984 and the trial court convicted the accused in 1986. After this, the matter went to the Allahabad High Court. It took 26 years to declare the trial court’s decision right here. After this, it took 15 years for the Supreme Court to maintain this decision. It is alleged that on 19 March 1984, the tuition teacher sent two other students out and raped the victim. Two students knocked on the door, but the teacher did not open the door. Then the victim’s grandmother came and saved her. When the girl’s family tried to register an FIR, the people of the accused side threatened her. However, an FIR was registered a few days later.
