Pune: Due To Parliament Session, Rahul Gandhi Skips Court Appearance In Case Filed By VD Savarkar’s Kin | File Pic
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi failed to appear in a Pune court on Monday in connection with a defamation complaint filed against him by the kin of Hindutva ideologue VD Savarkar due to the Winter Session of Parliament.
Gandhi’s lawyer Milind Pawar said his client had sought exemption from appearance due to the ongoing session of Parliament, adding the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha would be present in court on January 10.
Savarkar’s grandnephew Satyaki Savarkar had filed a complaint in a Pune court claiming Gandhi, in his speech in London in March 2023, stated that Savarkar had written in a book that he and five to six of his friends once beat up a Muslim man and he (Savarkar) felt happy.
As per the plea, VD Savarkar has not written this anywhere.
At the time, the court had asked police to investigate the allegations and file a report. The Vishrambaug police, after an inquiry, submitted that there is prima facie truth in the complaint.
On November 18, a special court for MPs/MLAs of Joint Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Amol Shinde issued an order directing Gandhi to appear before the court on December 2.
Advocate Sangram Kolhatkar, who is representing complainant Satyaki Savarkar, urged the court to issue a non-bailable warrant against Gandhi as he had failed to appear before the court on three occasions.
It was contempt of court since Gandhi had failed to appear despite receiving the summons, Kolhatkar argued.
Action has been sought against the Congress leader under section 174 (non-attendance in obedience to an order from a public servant) of the Indian Penal Code, he said.
If he does not appear in court on January 10, a non-bailable warrant will be issued, Kolhatkar told reporters later.
Kolhatkar also presented a couple of news cuttings pertaining to a speech made by Rahul Gandhi on November 26 in which the latter had made similar comments against Savarkar.
He asked the court to refrain Gandhi from making any comments against Savarkar, to which Judge Shinde orally told advocate Pawar to ask his client to not make such remarks.
On October 4, the court had asked Gandhi to be present in person on October 23.
Gandhi, however, failed to do so with his lawyer telling the court that he had not received the summons.
On November 18, Pawar told the court his client needed time since he was busy with election campaigns. At the time, the court had asked Gandhi to be present on December 2.
On Monday, Judge Shinde kept the matter for hearing on January 10, when Gandhi is expected to be present.
