Bhubaneswar: A meeting convened by the Odisha State Minority Cell in Cuttack on Sunday sparked strong reactions to the recently passed Waqf Act (Amendment), with members and community leaders expressing serious apprehensions about its impact on constitutional rights and India’s secular framework.
The gathering, attended by minority community leaders, religious scholars, legal experts, and political representatives from various parties, served as a platform to dissect the implications of the amended legislation. Participants debated its broader social, legal, and political consequences, especially concerning minority rights and the autonomy of Waqf properties.
Concerns over Secular Values and Legal Autonomy
Speakers at the event alleged that the amended law undermines India’s secular foundations by centralizing control over Waqf properties and potentially allowing government overreach into religious affairs. Several attendees warned that the changes could pave the way for increased state interference, thereby diluting the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom under Article 25 and minority rights under Articles 29 and 30.
Sami Salim, Chairperson of the State Minority Cell, criticized the amendment for what he termed as “unilateral imposition” without adequate consultation with stakeholders. “This is not just a minority issue, it’s a question of constitutional balance. If necessary, we will approach the Supreme Court. We are compiling our objections to present them formally to the government,” he stated.
Divergent Political Responses
The political reactions at the meeting were notably split. Senior Biju Janata Dal (BJD) leader Ramjan Khan voiced support for a thorough review of the amended law. “There is confusion and lack of awareness among the people about what this amendment entails. We plan to submit a memorandum to the Hon’ble President and, if needed, the Chief Justice of India. This law must be revisited in light of constitutional values,” Khan asserted.
In contrast, Sikandar Ali, President of the BJP Minority Morcha (Odisha unit), defended the amendment, stating it was designed to enhance transparency and improve the management of Waqf properties for the welfare of the Muslim community. “The amendment is not anti-Muslim or anti-minority. It aims to eliminate corruption and ensure effective utilization of Waqf assets for educational and developmental purposes,” he said.
Future Course of Action and Legal Recourse
While a few voices advocated for public education and peaceful dialogue, most participants leaned toward taking legal recourse to challenge the amendment. A resolution was proposed to consult constitutional experts and initiate a wider public awareness campaign regarding the implications of the Act. The meeting ended with calls for unity among minority groups and preparation for possible judicial intervention
