The Supreme Court said, After being in a long-in relationship for a long time, the woman will not be able to accuse her partner of rape. The Supreme Court has recently ruled in a rape case. The special thing is that the two were living together for more than a decade. The court has described these allegations as a matter of sourness in relationships. The woman’s live-in partner has been given relief from criminal trial.
Stayed in live-in for 16 years
While hearing the petition, a bench of Supreme Court Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta said that in such circumstances it cannot be clarified that physical relations were established on the basis of marriage promise. The woman alleges that by promising marriage, she continued to have a relationship with the alleged accused bank officer for 16 years. The two lived together in a live-in relationship for 16 years. Was doing.
Crack case in relationships
The complainant is a lecturer by profession. The court has refused to accept his application. The Supreme Court said that both were educated and well educated and the relationship was made by consensus. Although both of them lived in different cities, they used to visit each other’s house. The court said that this is clearly a case of rift in relationships.
It is difficult to digest.
The bench said, “It is difficult to believe that the complainant has been bowing to every demand of the alleged accused for almost 16 years and has formed a relationship without protest.” The complainant has claimed that she was sexually abused by false promises of marriage. It is difficult to digest. A long period of 16 years, during which physical relations between the two continued without any opposition. From which it can be concluded that there was never any force or cheating in the relationship between the two. The court further said that even though it was accepted that sexual abuse was under the guise of alleged marriage promise, the fact that they were in a relationship for so long weakens their claim.
